Tough questions for West as Ukraine cities teeter
By Thomas Gibbons Neff and Matina Stevis Gridneff
LYSYCHANSK — With Russia about to encircle Sievierodonetsk, a city critical to its goal of seizing Ukraine’s east, and with a neighbouring city squarely in Moscow’s sights, the question of how realities on the ground will shape the next phase of the war became still more pressing Sunday (12) for Ukraine’s Western allies.
“The Russians are making every effort to cut off Sievierodonetsk,” the regional governor, Serhiy Haidai, said Sunday on Telegram, a messaging app. “The next two or three days will be significant.”
Across the river, Ukrainians trying to hold fast against the Russians in Lysychansk had the advantage of good terrain — but dwindling weaponry with which to defend it.
“If there is no help with military equipment, of course they will drive us out,” said Oleksandr Voronenko, 46, a military police officer stationed in Lysychansk. “Because every day, the equipment is destroyed. You have to replace it with something new.”
Ukrainian officials have been imploring NATO allies for faster delivery of longer-range weapons and the urgently needed replenishment of still more basic supplies, including ammunition.
But with the momentum of the war shifting more decisively in Russia’s favour, Ukraine’s allies — their economies threatened and their resolve tested — may soon find themselves forced to confront far more fundamental questions than what sort of weapons to provide, including whether to put pressure on Ukraine to reach a peace agreement with Russia or risk Russian escalation with more aggressive military support.
“There was always a sense that, when the centre of gravity shifted to the south and east, there would be the potential for greater Russian gains based on greater mass and their existing territorial acquisitions,” said Ian Lesser, a former US official who heads the Brussels office of the German Marshall Fund.
“But it does raise more serious longer-term questions about the nature of the conflict, Ukraine’s aims and Western aims in relation to those,” he said.
As Ukrainians wait, they are suffering horrific losses in the Donbas region where the fight for Sievierodonetsk is playing out. By Ukraine’s own assessment, it is losing between 100 and 200 people a day as the bloodshed there worsens, in part because of Russian material superiority and in part because of Ukraine’s determination to fight on despite the increasingly bleak picture in the east.
Those Western supplies that have made it through to the front line are neither as plentiful nor as sophisticated as Ukraine would like. And some never even make it into battle, hit by Russian strikes before they can even be deployed.
Late Saturday (11), Russian missiles hit a military warehouse in western Ukraine, wounding nearly two dozen people, and, according to Russia’s Defence Ministry, destroying anti-tank and anti-aircraft missile systems supplied to Ukraine by the United States and the European Union.
The Ukrainian government has poured troops and resources into its effort to hold on to Sievierodonetsk, a strategically important industrial city and the last major urban centre in the Donbas region of Luhansk that has not yet fallen. Russian forces have destroyed two bridges leading to the centre of Sievierodonetsk and were shelling the remaining one, an important supply line for Ukrainian forces, the regional governor said.
Now, the battle may be about to shift to its sister city, Lysychansk.
On Sunday, from atop a hill in Lysychansk, it was evident why the soon to be focal point of the Russian offensive appears easier to defend than other parts of Donbas: It is on high ground. The sprawling plains of the region are rich in natural resources, but elevation is a rarity.
That leaves the city’s Ukrainian defenders in an advantageous position.
But it’s impossible to defend Lysychansk, a city with a pre-war population of roughly 100,000, without the supplies needed to keep Ukrainian tanks and artillery stocked with shells and the thousands of troops garrisoned there fed and equipped.
This is the challenge the Ukrainian military is facing now as Russian forces near the end of their campaign to seize neighbouring Sievierodonetsk. Even with Sievierodonetsk captured, Ukrainian troops could most likely defend Lysychansk, in part because the Seversky Donets River separates the two cities — unless Russian forces succeed in severing the city’s supply routes.
It was clear Sunday that the Russians were attempting to accomplish just that by steadily advancing from the southeast.
Plumes of smoke and burning fields where artillery strikes had set the ground on fire enveloped Lysychansk in a semicircle Sunday afternoon. The frequent thuds of incoming and outgoing fire echoed across the city as civilians dragged empty bottles to fill up from a fire department water tanker jury-rigged with clean-water filters.
Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that “in many ways, the fate of our Donbas is being decided” around Sievierodonetsk and Lysychansk. But the first city is now virtually encircled, and if Russian forces continue to advance toward the mix of asphalt and bumpy field roads that serve as the only logistics pipeline into the second, Ukrainian officials will have to make a strategic decision: Withdraw or risk an encirclement of Lysychansk, too.
“We’re waiting for reinforcements,” said Voronenko, the military police officer, as a group of 20 or so residents began moving toward evacuation vans. “It has partly arrived in the last several days in the form of artillery. And if we get more, then we can probably hold them off.”
But nearly four months after Russia invaded, the Ukrainian military is running low on ammunition for its Soviet-era artillery and is not receiving enough ammunition, fast enough, leaving the fate of Lysychansk even more uncertain.
For European countries, the question of how to defend Ukraine now is both tactical and political — and raises issues closer to home.
Several EU members are fretting that they have sent too much of their own ammunition to Ukraine and are lagging behind in restocking their arsenals. With the bloc’s foreign policy and defence not integrated, European leaders have been forced to try source their own military supplies.
EU officials say they will try to tap a 9 billion euro ($9.5 billion) funding pot to jointly procure military equipment, trying to ease concerns that supporting Ukraine militarily has dangerously weakened defence capabilities elsewhere in Europe.
The bloc is also wrestling with the broader and politically fraught question of how to move forward with Ukraine’s bid to enter the EU. That decision could bolster Zelenskyy at home and perhaps give him more political flexibility to negotiate a cease-fire, but it could also lead Russia to dig in or worse.
In a visit to Kyiv on Saturday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said her administration would provide an opinion on whether the bloc should grant candidate status to Ukraine by the end of the week. Ultimately, however, the decision is a deeply political one that EU leaders will be called to answer at a summit June 23 and 24 in Brussels.
For most countries granted candidate status, it takes more than a decade of reforms and negotiations to become a full EU member.
Should Ukraine be given a green light, its road forward will most likely be difficult, considering the nation’s dire situation since the onset of war and the poor governance and corruption that marked it even before the invasion.
“Whatever the territorial reality on the ground, having that deepening prospect of Euro-Atlantic integration for Ukraine is very meaningful,” said Lesser, of the German Marshall Fund. “And to the extent that it fosters a growing prospect of an increasingly Westernized Ukraine versus a Russia that’s drifted out into an Asiatic imperial posture, the political contrast between these two actors will become more stark.”
-New York Times