By Susan Berger

For years, women with breast cancer in their families have been getting tested for mutations in two genes, known as BRCA1 and BRCA2, to determine whether they have a sharply elevated risk of the disease.

Now, doctors are increasingly recommending that anyone who was tested before 2014 go through genetic testing again — to look for a different mutation, one much less widely known.

It is on a gene called PALB2; people with the mutation have almost as great a risk of getting breast cancer as those who have the BRCA mutations. Like the BRCA mutations, this mutation also increases a patient’s risk of ovarian and pancreatic cancer.

Anyone who gets a genetic test for breast cancer now is likely to be screened for PALB2 mutations, which were found in 2014 to significantly raise breast cancer risk. But many patients screened before 2014 were not tested for it and may have a false sense of security if they were found to be free of the BRCA mutations, experts said.

Even now, few patients have heard of the gene, while BRCA is familiar to many.

“Hereditary breast cancer risk assessment needs to go beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 and include genes like PALB2,” said Dr. Peter Hulick, medical director of the Mark R. Neaman Centre for Personalized Medicine at NorthShore University HealthSystem in Evanston, Illinois. “Raising awareness with physicians and patients is critical, otherwise patients are getting an incomplete genetic assessment.”

This spring, a major association of medical geneticists issued new guidance for patients and doctors advising that women with PALB2 mutations be surveilled similarly to patients with BRCA mutations, and that, depending on family history, mastectomies could be an option to reduce the risk in some patients.

The guidance, issued by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, called the PALB2 mutation the “third most important breast cancer gene after BRCA1 and BRCA2.” Guidelines from National Comprehensive Cancer Network, as well as from the medical genetics organization, suggest that women with the PALB2 mutation should have MRIs and mammograms, alternating every six months. The guidance was based on peer-reviewed evidence by a team of cancer genetics experts.

Hulick said the risk of developing breast cancer was 40% to 60% greater among women with the PALB2 mutation, similar to the risk from BRCA.

“The reality is we are all at risk for something, it’s just whether we have that line of sight,” Hulick said. “It’s a real awareness issue. Now people can put PALB2 in their care plan along with structured family history tools.”

Susan Karnick’s mother had breast cancer years ago, and genetic testing showed no BRCA mutation. Karnick, 55, of Crystal Lake, Illinois, had breast calcification and was alternating mammograms and MRIs every six months when her doctor suggested genetic testing. It showed she had PALB2.

After consulting with an oncologist, she opted for a prophylactic mastectomy. After the surgery, pathology showed she had Stage 1 breast cancer in one breast and five precancerous lesions in the other, in spite of the surveillance every six months.

“My doctor said he was happy I didn’t even wait a month or two,” Karnick said. “I needed no chemo or radiation.”

She is enrolled in a pancreatic cancer prevention program at the University of Wisconsin and will undergo screening. Because she had previously had a hysterectomy to treat benign ovarian cysts, ovarian cancer is not a concern.

“I was just so grateful for that genetic testing,” she said. “It was stressful and scary but my goodness, I had lifesaving surgery and I would not have known.”

Heidi Marsh, 46, of Seattle, tested positive for the PALB2 mutation after her mother — a breast cancer and pancreatic cancer patient — was found to have it. She said her own doctor was unaware of the gene.

“My OB-GYN was aware of my mom’s history and never suggested genetic testing,” Marsh said. “She never heard of it. I educated her. The oncologist she sent me to did not suggest surgery.”

But Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, a partner of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre, where Marsh’s mother had been an oncology nurse, did know about the gene mutation. The group put together a team that included a surgical oncologist, a pancreatic cancer specialist, a geneticist, a nutritionist and a social worker.

“This has been life-changing,” said Marsh, who had her fallopian tubes removed in April. (She was told most ovarian cancer first occurred in the tubes. She plans to remove her ovaries after menopause.)

She will have breast monitoring with alternating mammograms and breast MRIs every six months, and she has had an endoscopic ultrasound to look at her pancreas.

She has found a Facebook group, PALB2 Warriors, to be helpful. Because she has a background in health care — she was a phlebotomist — she looks further than individual postings, she said, to studies that are placebo-controlled and peer-reviewed for information. But when it comes to personal stories of experience with prophylactic mastectomies and reconstruction, she said that was invaluable.

“This was not remotely on my radar screen,” she said. “In one sense I feel empowered. But I also feel like I am waiting for the other shoe to drop, that cancer will be inevitable.”

But mostly, she is thankful that she knows about PALB2 and the risks involved.

“It’s an alarm clock and a wake-up call,” she said. “You can do something about it if you choose.”

-New York Times