As his political alliance breaks up, Netanyahu faces a battle at home
By Isabel Kershner
JERUSALEM — Still fighting Israel’s outside enemies on multiple fronts, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu woke up on Monday (10) to a new political battlefield at home.
The departure this weekend of Benny Gantz and his centrist National Unity party from Israel’s emergency wartime government is unlikely to immediately sever Netanyahu’s grip on power. The prime minister’s governing coalition still commands a narrow majority of 64 seats in the 120-seat parliament.
But Gantz’s move means that Netanyahu is now totally dependent on his far right and ultra-Orthodox coalition partners as he prosecutes the war in the Gaza Strip in the face of mounting international opprobrium, leaving him increasingly isolated and exposed at home and abroad.
Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot, another powerful member of National Unity, also left Netanyahu’s small war Cabinet. They are both former military chiefs who were widely viewed as key voices of moderation in the five-member body, which was formed in October after the Hamas-led assault on Israel prompted the Israeli bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza.
The two centrist politicians raised public confidence in the government’s decision-making process at a time of national trauma. They also lent the war Cabinet an aura of legitimacy and consensus as Israel fought Hamas in Gaza, as well as its archenemy Iran and its other proxies, including the powerful Hezbollah militia across Israel’s northern border with Lebanon.
Gantz accused Netanyahu of “political procrastination”, suggesting that he had been putting off critical strategic decisions to ensure his political survival. His decision to quit the wartime government ushers in a new period of political instability and left many Israelis wondering where the country goes from here.
Describing the political shake-up as “incredibly consequential,” Yohanan Plesner, president of the Israel Democracy Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Jerusalem, said in a statement that Israelis had already been giving low grades to the government on a host of wartime issues. That included the handling of the fighting and relations with the United States, Israel’s crucial ally, he said.
“With Gantz’s absence, I expect those grades to become even lower,” Plesner said.
Gantz had issued an ultimatum three weeks ago, warning Netanyahu that he would break up the emergency government unless the prime minister came up with clear plans, including who would replace Hamas as the ruler of post-war Gaza and how to bring back the scores of hostages still being held in the Palestinian enclave.
Gantz joined the government in October to foster a sense of unity at a time of crisis. He joined forces with his political rival, Netanyahu, despite a deep lack of trust between the two and a history of betrayal. The last time Gantz went into a government with Netanyahu, in 2020, it also ended badly after Netanyahu broke their power-sharing agreement. The influence of Gantz and Eisenkot, whose son, a soldier, was killed in December while fighting in Gaza, has waned in recent months, leading many Israelis to ask why they hadn’t left the emergency government and joined the opposition earlier. Gantz has called for early elections this fall.
Netanyahu’s formal partners remaining in the war Cabinet are his defence minister, Yoav Gallant, a rival within their conservative Likud party whom Netanyahu tried to fire last year; and Ron Dermer, a seasoned Netanyahu confidant with more diplomatic than political experience. It is unclear if it will continue to function.
A separate and broader security Cabinet includes two ultranationalist party leaders: Itamar Ben-Gvir, the minister for national security, and Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister. Both want to resettle Gaza with Israelis.
Ben-Gvir and Smotrich have both vowed to bring down Netanyahu’s government if he proceeds with an Israeli proposal for a deal involving a truce and a swap of hostages for Palestinian prisoners, which, as outlined by President Joe Biden over a week ago, would effectively wind down the war.
-New York Times
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.