Sri Lanka tax payers look to tighten belts further or migrate as progressive taxes bite
By Shihar Aneez
COLOMBO – Millions of Sri Lankan individuals and corporates have to cut spending and investment from January as steep income tax rates come into force to finance a bloated state, amid 65% inflation and turnover tax hikes already depleting disposable incomes.
The higher income taxes are coming in to effect nine months after the government declared bankruptcy and announced sovereign debt default and 10 months after the currency collapsed from 200 to 360 rupees to the US dollar almost halving the real income of the people.
But the tax hike is likely to hit the spending on consumption of wage earners in particular who have already taken loans, leases and housing loans.
Progressive Taxation
A person who earns 150,000 Sri Lankan rupee monthly will have to pay only 2.3% of the total income, but the rate jumps to 28.7% for a person who earns one million rupees a month.
“I don’t know where to cut spending,” said a 52-year old banker who is still struggling to avoid default of his vehicle lease and a home loan.
“When I took both loans, the interest rate was single digit and I had a monthly saving of 100,000 rupees. But with the high inflation and higher energy prices, no money is available to save now even though I have shifted to cheaper products now,” the father of three said, asking not to be named.
“According to the new tax rates, I will have to pay around 50,000 rupees. But to accommodate that, I will have to either stop paying my car lease or the housing loan. If not, I will have to stop the studies of my kids or reduce the consumption. I am still confused.”
Similar to the banker, thousands of private sector employees who have been paying personal income tax are grumbling about the new tax increases.
Some are making plans to migrate.
Sustaining bloated public sector
Most private sector company officials said they want to pay taxes, but lack of transparency, still high government spending and wastage, as well as irresponsible political decisions give them a perception that taxation is unfair.
Sri Lanka followed a strategy called ‘Revenue based fiscal consolidation’ from 2015 to 2019 where the entire burden of adjustment was placed on the tax payers, especially the private sector, where cost cutting or ‘spending based consolidation’ was dropped under an International Monetary Fund (IMF) backed program.
Critics say the unusual strategy departing from standard fiscal consolidation was probably based on Western progressive or ‘anti-state-austerity’ ideology which became popular in Washington policy circles after the 2008-9 collapse of the Federal Reserve’s housing bubble.
Under ‘revenue based fiscal consolidation’ expenditure as a share of GDP went up from 17.3% of GDP in 2014 to 18.9% by 2018 and 22.3% by 2019 according to central bank data, as spending outpaced revenues.
Debt to GDP ratio went up from 72.3% of GDP in 2014 to 86.2% by 2019.
Central government external debt went up from 30% of GDP in 2014 to 41.3% by 2019 as money was printed to suppress interest rates and the currency collapsed twice under a strategy called ‘exchange rate as the first line of defence’.
Growth also stalled as stabilization policies were repeatedly slammed because the ‘first line of defence’ failed to stop currency crises coming from central bank re-financed credit from over-aggressive open market operations.
As forex shortages came the government also borrowed heavily from abroad through sovereign bonds, syndicated loans and Chinese budget support loans without conditions to tighten policy, pushing up foreign debt adding to previous borrowings including those taken for so-called white elephants.
Sri Lanka has a bloated public sector and loss-making state enterprises which the influential Marxists Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) and previous Rajapaksa regimes have opposed privatizing.
SOEs are stuffed full of political appointees and are also used by line ministers to get vehicles outside their official allocations.
The public sector is also bloated with unemployed graduates each year, a strategy also popularized by the JVP, which was picked up by then President Mahinda Rajapaksa from 2005 as an election winning strategy.
The country has a bloated set of ministers, deputy ministers to the point where the ruling party has no back benchers to speak of.
“Private sector employees are wasting all their energy to sustain the mostly politically appointed and inefficient public sector. How can this be fair?” asked Sunil, an owner of a vehicle repair firm, who did not want to give his full name.
“My employees are earning their income by working in extreme weather conditions and from early morning to late night. How can the government tax these hard working employees just to pay the politically appointed state workers?”
Ministers under successive Sri Lankan governments have filled state institutions with their supporters to ensure easy victory in the next election. Most of these politically appointed people are involved in politics rather than serving the public, analysts say.
Power and Energy Minister Kanchana Wijesekera has said the state-run Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) has around 26,000 employees instead of optimum capacity of 5,000.
In the last few years thousands of meter readers were made permanent employees of the CEB. Meter readers from both CEB and National Water Supply and Drainage board visit the same house every month and take readings from meters that are one or two feet apart.
National carrier Sri Lankan Airlines and state-owned Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) are also make big losses. Each time the currency collapses under the ‘first line of defence strategy’, both the national debt and losses of the state enterprises go up.
Similarly, a top government official said at least 100,000 state employees are paid without doing anything for the public and removing them is extremely difficult due to trade union protests.
Ex-President Gotabaya Rajapaksa also started another multi-task force to hire people with a low level of education to the public sector. In this budget 9.8 billion rupees was allocated to the multi-task force.
The multi-task force came despite taxes being slashed in 2019, which economic bureaucrats said was needed to close a ‘persistent output gap’ and even more money was printed.
However President Ranil Wickremesinghe has announced some cost cutting measures, departing from the ‘revenue based fiscal consolidation’ measures. He is also trying to privatize state enterprises amid opposition from some political quarters.
Every tax rupee, mainly collected from the country’s private sector, contributes 86 cents to pay the public sector wages and pensions. With current spending outstripping total revenues government borrows to finance day-to-day spending not only to invest.
After the central bank prints money to suppress rates and trigger currency crises, the inevitable stabilization policies that come in their wake pushes up the interest bill. There were currency crises in 2015/2016 and 2018.
At the moment, after two years of money printing to suppress rates and boost growth, interest rates are around 30%.
Unfair taxing, no transparency
Unlike in the past, the new tax system considers all the allowances including fuel, phone, and even food as an income and taxed. This means the monthly income does not have to be in cash alone.
Some taxpayers believe that the tax system is unfair because, while wage earners in the formal sector is caught in the net, others categories of potential tax payers may not be similarly paying taxes.
State workers including doctors get tax slashed cars, while politicians get tax free cars.
“I have no choice on my personal income tax because it is deducted as Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax by the company,” said Shanaka, a human resource manager in a Colombo-based private sector company.
“But not many people who earn 10 times more than me don’t do that.
“It’s unfair. Why should I pay high taxes when others through corrupt practices don’t pay taxes and use all the loopholes and evade paying taxes? They even get tax amnesty from time to time by the governments they back in elections.”
Some political analysts have warned of possible protests by private sector and formal sector employees once they see the adverse impacts of the next tax rates.
In 2019 similarly progressive individual income tax led to many so-called ‘professionals’ to back ex-President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. The professional led government slashed taxes, printed even more money triggering the worst currency crisis in the central bank’s history.
The transparency of government spending is also one of the concerns why people are reluctant to pay taxes.
Before the excesses under ‘revenue based fiscal consolidation’ a number of so-called white elephants including the Lotus Tower in Colombo has been built on borrowed money.
Two small business owners said despite high taxes by the government this year said they have not seen any improvement in public service provided by the government.
“In fact, the public service is gradually deteriorating as political appointees are there in all government departments,” Shanthan, a rent-a-car business owner, said.
“There is no way I can understand how my tax money is spent and how it is an incentive for my business.
“The government is taxing us more to cover their past inefficiencies. There are a lot of white elephant projects and billions of money has been spent. But there is no public accountability by any of the political leaders.”
“Rather than paying taxes and witnessing the continuous corruption, it is better to leave the country and pay higher taxes in another country to get better services. And I have decided to migrate,” he said without revealing the country he is moving to.
“I have explored all the options to reduce my taxes. But it is very difficult.”
-economynext.com
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.