Europe to lend US$105 billion to Ukraine, without touching Russian funds
By Jeanna Smialek
BRUSSELS — European leaders agreed early Friday (19) to keep Ukraine funded for two years with a loan of 90 billion euros (about $105 billion), though they failed to agree on their first-choice option of using Russian state assets frozen on the Continent as backing for the loan.
That ambitious frozen-asset plan was killed at the eleventh hour as European heads of state and government met in Brussels — a show of division that risked making the European Union appear indecisive at a key moment.
Instead, European leaders announced that they will funnel money to Ukraine with a loan backed by the EU budget. Because the plan does not leverage the large stash of Russian savings immobilized in Europe, it is likely to cost more and could prove more difficult to quickly scale up than the original idea.
But because it will still get needed cash to Kyiv, officials celebrated it as a win.
“This will address the urgent financial needs of Ukraine,” Antonio Costa, the president of the European Council, said at an early morning news conference in Brussels.
He added that the European Union would reserve its option to eventually use Russia’s immobilized assets. European nations took action last week to freeze those savings indefinitely.
The funding plan comes at a crucial moment, as Ukraine negotiates potential peace terms with the United States. And timing was important, with Ukraine expected to begin running out of money early in 2026.
European officials had painted the funding as an opportunity to show that they are powerful actors on the global stage — and strong partners for President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine, who welcomed the decision in a social media post Friday.
“This is significant support that truly strengthens our resilience,” he wrote on the social platform X. “It is important that Russian assets remain immobilized and that Ukraine has received a financial security guarantee for the coming years.”
For months, European leaders had hoped to overcome Belgian concerns to clinch a deal on using the 210 billion euros of frozen Russian assets held in Europe to back the massive loan to Ukraine. The setup was supposed to fund much of Ukraine’s governing and war expenses in 2026 and 2027.
But the idea of such a loan was always risky: Russia is already taking legal action over what it paints as the unlawful seizure of its assets. After weeks of back-and-forth, Belgium — where most of the assets frozen in Europe are held — remained unconvinced headed into Thursday’s (18) meeting, worried that it could be on the hook for Russian retaliation.
The guarantees that Belgium demanded to protect against that threat, however, proved too much for some other European countries to quickly accept.
Europeans want a voice in determining how to end the biggest war on the Continent in 80 years and secure peace afterwards. But President Donald Trump and the Kremlin have frequently left Europe out of discussions over Ukraine’s future.
In fact, the Trump administration has recently made it clear how negatively it views the European Union. The administration warned in a national security strategy that Europe faces “civilizational erasure,” charging that the bloc and other transnational bodies “undermine political liberty” and national sovereignty, allow uncontrolled immigration and place the Continent on a path that will leave it “unrecognizable in 20 years or less”.
The weeks spent wrangling over the frozen asset plan that ultimately failed may suggest to the world that the EU’s clunky structure and diverse voices remain barriers to rapid action — even at urgent moments.
The collapse of the frozen asset loan plan was a political stumble for both Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, and Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, the bloc’s executive arm. Both had championed it.
Still, leaders argued that the agreed-upon alternative would serve its purpose. They emphasized that Ukraine will still not be asked to pay back the loan unless Russia pays reparations.
“This is a decisive message for an end to the war,” Merz said in a statement. “Putin will only make concessions once he realizes his war will not pay off.”
-New York Times
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.